Celebrity Justice
Court Commish to Brit -- I'm Layin' Down the Law

The Commissioner in the Britney Spears custody case has written his order giving a blow-by-blow account of what went down in the case.
Exclusive: Click to read!
Commissioner Scott Gordon ruled that Spears "was not in substantial compliance with material provisions of the Court's September 17, 2007 order." He then continues.

Gordon ruled "the minor children shall remain in the custody of [K-Fed] with the exception of those specific dates and times [visitation]." He also ruled all of Brit's visitation must be monitored.

He also ruled that her visitation rights will be terminated "if any conduct or action by (Britney) endangers the minor children." The monitor has the power to terminate her visitation rights.

Gordon said Britney "is ordered to undergo testing for the use of controlled substances and alcohol," something he required in a previous order. As we first reported, Spears did not submit to drug tests as required by the Court. Gordon now says "... refusal to submit to a test ... shall be deemed by the Court as a failed test."

She's also required to undergo "individual counseling" at least once a week as required by Gordon last month and must also meet with a parenting coach so they can "observe [her] interaction with the minor children and her parenting skills."

And as we first reported, both Britney and K-Fed are required to appear in court on October 26.

Related

Documents

The Judge's Order

Reader Comments

(Page 3 of 17) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

31. I feel sorry for those kids and the rest of society once they become teens. Britney is an unfit mother and it appears to be quite obvious that she really doesn't want to mother those two boys. As for Kevin, if he's willing to take on the job then he should be applauded for it. Who knows if he is doing it for the money or not every child deserves to be loved by two parents and these two boys maybe loved by both parents but one is certainly more unfit then the other. To be quite honest I don't think Britney has any talent and has been way overrated for a long time. Lets get over her and let her self destruct on her own.

Posted at 3:34PM on Oct 4th 2007 by oh please

32. It was mentioned on the Larry King show "Britney" may want to loss custody of her kids on purpose. They were saying she is basically setting things up for an "Anna Nicole " type event. As I observe Britney's lackadaisical behavior about her kids over the past week, I can see she is definitely heading in the "Anna Nicole " direction.......

Posted at 3:34PM on Oct 4th 2007 by Viewsonic

33. Ding Dang y'all. Britney just wants to have fun. She's probably happy to be rid of those two snotty little brats.

Posted at 3:40PM on Oct 4th 2007 by swamp

34. Haaaaaaaaa.....If it wasn't for britt and her M.O.N.E.Y........Mr k-fed wouldn't be able to hire that top lawyer !!!! If it wasn't for britt that LOOSER would have nothing...Nobody knew who this losser was before he got with britt and her DOLLA...DOLLAS...People are praising him like he is father of the year!!! OK maybey he does love his kids BUT we all know what he is about!!! TMZ now it;s time to turn the camara on this LOOSER and show everyone what he is doing!!!! YA britt has some problems at this time but I hope and pray that she will see the light and fight for her children even harder NOW !!!

Posted at 3:39PM on Oct 4th 2007 by Melissa

35. Usually when people want to go in the Anna Nicole" directions ,they cut tides with things and people they are extremely close to to avoid guilt . Britney is making that clear to us.

Posted at 3:38PM on Oct 4th 2007 by Viewsonic

36. I think if the paps just left her alone, and with her losing the kids, no camera flashing, people would ignore her, she might realize she is a mess! But with the spotlight on her, I really think she is taking the cameras and stories about her as a compliment. Like people actually care about her!

MAYBE all the paps should leave her alone and make her realize America doesn't care anymore.

Posted at 3:39PM on Oct 4th 2007 by Ang

37.
Once you get the county involved in your life it's a lot of hoop jumping to get them back out, As it should be when children are involved.
I am surprised they are doing this to a celeb but impressed all the same, Something had to be done.
TMZ is excited about that Oct 26 court date! Play the circus music!

I agree with the post who is tired of reading the use of the kids first and middle names all the time, just call them by their first names like a grown up would

Posted at 3:40PM on Oct 4th 2007 by 7

38. I have thought that Brit was bi-polar for a long time. I saw it in my Mother in Law & her actions are almost identical. Why o Why is K Fed not being drug tested? He has bragged about doing drugs & loving drugs, etc. Also,k why can't these people personally take care of their children instead of hiring nannies. It is not like they have 8-5 jobs or something!

Posted at 3:40PM on Oct 4th 2007 by countincash

39. Kevin's other children and baby momma are around all the time. She says he is a good dad. He left the mom, not the kids. Like most relationships that end with children involved, "mommy and daddy still love you, we just can't stand eachother anymore". Just because he doesn't love her doesn't mean he doesn't love his kids (both Shar and Britney's)

I beleive Kevin had a job when he met Brit. He was a dancer and making a living at it. I also beleive he tried a singing/rap career, it didn't pan out. He has also been persuing acting gigs. So he does work. He does seem to have some misguided ambition, but at least he is trying to do something for himself. btw, I am not a fan of his or a supporter in any way, but the facts are the facts.

If Kevin was a women, not working and asking for child support and alimony, would we really be having a conversation about her living off of his money? I think not (well, maybe we would call her a gold digger, but I doubt it). If he is the costodial parent, she should pay. and the fact that it is based on a persons income and ability is just that, she makes a hell of a lot of money each month, the children get a percentage based on that. It's pretty simple.

Kevin is also not the parent that is out constantly looking drugged and drunk with his private bits hanging out for the world to be repulsed by. Kevin also has not brought the children into the world of crazy like she did with the paps. No one has come forward and claimed he is unfit. The grandparents support him having the kids. THE COURT has deemed him the best parent for the boys to be with.

Let's hope he has not only stepped up to the plate, but that he hits a home run and is a great parent, for the sake of the boys.

Posted at 3:40PM on Oct 4th 2007 by kitty has no hair

40. K-fed needs to be gettin drug tested too its only fair and plus im pretty sure he's a crack head too!

Posted at 11:44PM on Oct 4th 2007 by sed

41. #29 well said!!!!

Posted at 3:41PM on Oct 4th 2007 by no picnic

42. Great! Now can the courts go after the other half a million parents in CA who neglect/abuse their kids?!?!

Posted at 3:41PM on Oct 4th 2007 by OC

43. "Holy trainwreck, Batman! Commissioner Gordon to the rescue!"

Ha ha...props to you.

Posted at 3:42PM on Oct 4th 2007 by DS

44. damn brittney you better watch out, if you give your kids some candy after there bed time TMZ is gonna get YOU there gonna run to the judge with all that video evidence and have your kids taken away forever.... forever...FOREVER lol tmz is starting to get corny, there gonna have all those stars in hollywood arrested watch out for TMZPD they got more things on you to put you away for a while then real cops lol YA DIGG

Posted at 11:24AM on Oct 5th 2007 by chris

45. K-Fed isnt getting drug tested b/c there wasn't evidence to have him tested. There was just- cause for Britney to be tested (ummm, shaved head, umbrella attack, Witnesses, etc)... Nothing on Kevin. End of story

Posted at 3:42PM on Oct 4th 2007 by Ang

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments